Manuscript Instructions
Research Reviews (RR) encourages the authors to submit their esteemed work, in English, concerning fundamental and clinical aspects of all areas under the following sections
Submission of Article
Articles must be original & are to be submit through online submission process Authors are requested to kindly follow "Manuscript Instructions" during preparation of manuscript.
Things to Note
Correspondence
All submissions should be accompanied by the e-mail ID of corresponding author. All correspondence regarding the papers will be sent to the corresponding author unless specifically indicated otherwise at the time of submission. All correspondence from the Editorial Board shall be through e-mail only.
Article Format
Editorials are solicited by the Editorial Board and therefore should be sent only on our request. Guidelines for other articles are given below: Basic Requirements: Articles submitted to Research Reviews (RR) shall conform to the Best Practice Guidelines based on COPE’s (Committee on Publication Ethics). For this, kindly go through Publication Ethics. Originality: By submitting paper for publication to Research Reviews (RR), Authors (all authors of the article) certify that;
Authorship
Research Reviews (RR) recommends following 4 criteria should be met for authorship:
Copyright
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
Disclosure of commercial interests
Sources of support for the research or article must be acknowledged in the paper and any financial involvement that might indicate a conflict of interests should be disclosed at the time of submission.
Patient Anonymity and Consent
Since Research Reviews (RR) is largely available for public access, ethical and legal considerations mandate that patients’ anonymity be preserved. Research papers must indicate informed consent for procedures and the involvement of an ethical committee, proof of which may be required in the review process of the paper.
Format
S.No |
Manuscript |
Word limit for abstract |
Word limit for manuscript |
Type of Abstract |
No. of Tables/Graphs/images & photos. |
References |
1. |
Editorial |
25-50 |
1000–1500 |
- |
- |
- |
2. |
Original Article |
250 |
3000–4000 |
Structured |
4 tables, 4 graphs, 3 images/photos |
Atleast 15 |
3. |
Brief Communication |
200-250 |
1200–1500 |
UnStructured |
1 table, 1 graph, 1 image/photo |
Atleast 10 |
4. |
Review Article |
200-250 |
Not more than 5000 |
UnStructured |
- |
30-50 |
5. |
Case Report |
150-200 |
Not more than 1500 |
UnStructured |
2 tables, 2 graphs, 2 images/photos |
Atleast 10 |
6. |
Letter to Editor |
25-50 |
500-800 |
UnStructured |
- |
Upto 5 |
Components of articles
Title: Short, meaningful and interesting, preferably not more than 12 words (or 72 characters) in length.
Authors and affiliations: Full name, qualifications, designation and institutional affiliation of all authors, complete postal address, contact number and e-mail ID of corresponding author.
Abstract: Stating the purpose(s) of the study or investigation, basic procedures and methodology, important findings and principal conclusions. Emphasis should be on new and important aspects of the study or observations. No references allowed. All original full length articles and systematic reviews should contain a structured abstract with not more than 250 words under the following headings: Background, objectives, Material & Methods along with statistical analysis used, Results and Conclusions. Case Reports, short communication should contain unstructured abstract with 200-250 words.
Introduction: Brief review of the subject or background; purpose of the article and /or rationale for the study; pertinent references only.
Material & methods: Selection criteria, details of the methods/procedures so that others can reproduce the same. For established methods, give references; for not so well known methods, give brief description and references; for new or substantially modified methods, give details, reasons for use and for modification(s) and limitations. Drug(s) and chemical(s) should be precisely identified by generic name(s), dose(s) and route(s) of administration. Reports of randomized clinical trials should present information on all major study elements, including the protocol, assignment of interventions (methods of randomization, concealment of allocation to treatment groups), and the method of masking (blinding), based on the CONSORT Statement (http://www.consort-statement.org).
Initiative |
Type of Study |
Source |
CONSORT |
Randomized controlled trials |
|
STARD |
Studies of diagnostic accuracy |
|
QUOROM |
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
http://www.consort- statement.org/Initiatives/MOOSE/moose.pdf |
STROBE |
Observational studies in epidemiology |
|
MOOSE |
Meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology |
http://www.consort- statement.org/Initiatives/MOOSE/moose.pdf |
Statistics: Whenever possible quantify findings and present them with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty (such as confidence intervals). Authors should report losses to observation (such as, dropouts from a clinical trial). When data are summarized in the Results section, specify the statistical methods used to analyze them. Define statistical terms, abbreviations, and most symbols. Specify the computer software used. Use upper italics (P 0.048). For all P values include the exact value and not less than 0.05 or 0.001.
Ethics: When reporting studies on human beings, indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional or regional) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (available at http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17-c_e.html). For prospective studies involving human participants, authors are expected to mention about approval of (regional/ national/ institutional or independent Ethics Committee or Review Board, obtaining informed consent from adult research participants and obtaining assent for children aged over 7 years participating in the trial. The age beyond which assent would be required could vary as per regional and/ or national guidelines. Ensure confidentiality of subjects by desisting from mentioning participants’ names, initials or hospital numbers, especially in illustrative material. When reporting experiments on animals, indicate whether the institution’s or a national research council’s guide for, or any national law on the care and use of laboratory animals was followed. Evidence for approval by a local Ethics Committee (for both human as well as animal studies) must be supplied by the authors on demand. Animal experimental procedures should be as humane as possible and should be clearly stated. The ethical standards of experiments must be in accordance with the guidelines provided by the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Humans for studies involving experimental animals and human beings. The journal will not consider any paper which is ethically unacceptable. A statement on ethics committee permission and ethical practices must be included in all research articles under the ‘Materials and Methods’ section.
Results: Present in logical sequence in text, tables and illustrations, avoid repeating the data.
Discussion: Emphasize the new and important aspects of the study and the conclusions that follow, the implications and the limitations; relate to other relevant studies; avoid repeating the details given in introduction and/or results.
Acknowledgements: For contributions that need acknowledging but do not justify authorship, with prior permission from the persons being acknowledged. Limit to ten.
References: Accuracy of citation is the author’s responsibility. The reference style is given below and conforms to the Vancouver style. Each reference should be assigned a number, consecutively in the order of mention in the text. The original number should be reused each time the same reference is cited in the text. The number should be placed in the text within square brackets [1], outside the full-stops and commas and inside colons and semi-colons. When multiple references are cited at a given place in the text, use a hyphen to join the first and last numbers that are inclusive and use commas to separate non-inclusive numbers.[2-5,7,10] The list of references should be given at the end of the paper. Where there are 6 or less authors, list ALL the authors. Where there are more than 6 authors, use et al after mentioning the names of six authors.
Example
Editorial-Peer Review process
Kindly go through Journal website (Editorial-Peer Review Section).
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.